If AI enables a finance team to produce the same output in four days instead of five, something valuable has been created.
A productivity dividend.
The obvious answer is that shareholders should benefit.
Of course they should.
But does all of it need to flow there?
Could some become:
better customer service?
more innovation?
shorter working weeks?
training?
higher salaries?
additional commercial activity?
more resilient finance teams?
AI creates an opportunity to rethink work, rather than simply compress it.
The most interesting organisations may be those that ask:
“What could we do with this capacity that wasn't possible before?”
rather than only:
“How many people can we remove?”
Be part of a human led profession
Join Human Led Finance free and sign the pledge, or find out how your organisation can become Human Led Certified.
Join freeFor employersMore insights
Before you buy another AI tool, ask what happens to your people.
Finance and procurement leaders are being presented with an extraordinary number of AI solutions. Every demonstration promises something, faster processing, lower costs, fewer manual tasks, greater accuracy, more automation.
23 October 2026 · 1 min readThe most dangerous AI output, might be the one that looks right.
One of the greatest risks in AI-enabled finance isn't necessarily an obviously incorrect answer in my opinion, It's a convincing one. A beautifully structured financial analysis, a confident explanation of an unusual variance, a supplier assessment that appears comprehensive or even a forecast supported by charts, assumptions and persuasive commentary.
22 October 2026 · 1 min readIf Ai saves your team 10 hours per week, who get's those hours back?
If Ai saves your team 10 hours per week, who get's those hours back? Let's think about it, your finance team adopts AI, reporting becomes faster, invoice processing requires less intervention, reconciliations become increasingly automated and suddenly, work that took 40 hours takes 30. Now that's a productivity improvement!
19 October 2026 · 1 min read